The latest ? 2 decide to try shown zero relationships anywhere between ages and you will pride invention

The latest ? 2 decide to try shown zero relationships anywhere between ages and you will pride invention

All teachers regarding the data was certified Enneagram educators from the Narrative Lifestyle. This new Enneagram Interval training Programmes used four pri sorts of boards, (2) didactic studying, (3) meditation exercises, and you can (4) experiential exploration. Enneagram Extreme Classes educators then followed a plan named The new Enneagram Rigorous®: Integrating Mental Lifetime and you may Spirit.

The 3 Introductory courses integrated pri studying methods. The brand new Berkeley direction provided relaxed Enneagram style of boards and you can didactic reading. Brand new Minnesota movement utilized all four of your number one reading methods. Brand new Palo Alto way made use of Enneagram form of panels, didactic studying, and you will experiential exploration such as for example directed visualization.

Analysis Research

Forms was typed because of the a research secretary and you can provided for good Cook-Greuter-formal SCT scorer (Hy and you will Loevinger 1996) through article mail. Password wide variety dominican cupid free trial were used and so the rater is actually blind in order to the nature of one’s attempt, the brand new times of your shot, together with degree category kind of. This new scorer accompanied the training of the Susan Create-Greuter, using the new Loevinger guide, apart from stems beyond the tips guide (Cook-Greuter 1999). Obtained responses was indeed sent back on researchers in the a stick out pass on sheet that has been after that employed for studies research. To make certain reliability of scoring to have contributes to and this participants went upwards or off a couple of amount, a sample ones training has also been obtained because of the Plan-Greuter herself.

Overall performance

An analysis of variance (ANOVA) confirmed that there were no pre-existing ego development differences at baseline among the participants between the sites, F(8, 9) = 0.38, p = .93. The pretest and posttest ego development scores were significantly correlated (r = .48, p < .001), whereby participants with higher pre-training scores also had higher post-training scores.

Because there are much more avove the age of younger people contained in this try, an analysis are used to check on the relationship anywhere between age bracket and you may studies effect. As a whole, forty people (33%, n = ) increased no less than one grade following studies. Proportionally, a great deal more fifty–59 12 months olds (45%, letter = ) compared to the most other age groups increased one or more grade after the training (20%, letter = 1/5, not as much as 29; 0%, letter = 0/step three, 30–39 seasons olds; 25%, n = 7/twenty-eight, 40–forty two season olds; and you may twenty-four%, n = 8/33, 60+ seasons olds). To look at if or not this pattern is actually statistically tall, a beneficial ? dos shot of freedom are calculated from the researching many years category and if a person knowledgeable pride stage continuing growth of that or even more values adopting the input (or perhaps not).

An analysis has also been presented to check on the partnership between new member sex and you may education impact. Whether or not proportionally, so much more ladies (36%, letter = ) than just men (18%, n = 4/22) state-of-the-art no less than one amounts following the knowledge, a good ? 2 try from versatility revealed no matchmaking anywhere between gender and ego development.

Two repeated-measures ANOVAs were conducted to test for within-subject ego development changes across the training sites. The first model examined the interaction term of ego development by training site type as a dichotomous variable (intensive site vs. introductory site); the model was not significant at the p < .05 level, F(1,120) = 1.32, p = .25. The second model examined the interaction term of ego development by individual training site; the model was also not significant at the p < .05 level, F(7, 114) = 1.40, p = .21.

Paired sample t tests were conducted to examine whether there were significant changes in ego development scores before compared to after the Enneagram training interventions at each site. Data revealed that the Asheville 2005 participant group showed a significant increase in ego development scores following the intervention, t(22) = ? 3.36, p < .01. Table 4 sument scores and the paired t test results.

You Might Also Like

Leave a Reply

Back to top